Search for: "V D"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 76,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2016, 12:22 pm
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:00 am
Sharp (D. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
I concur in the majority opinion receding from Shop in the Grove, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
Louis D. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 5:26 pm
Of interest in 3Form v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:59 pm
INNOVATIVE RESOURCE GROUP, LLC., a foreign limited liability company, d/b/a APS HEALTHCARE MIDWEST, Defendant and Appellee. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
KENNEDY, d/b/a CANADIAN CONNECTION, Respondent and Appellant. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:41 am
GREAT FALLS ATHLETIC CLUB, LLC d/b/a PEAK HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER, Defendant and Appellee. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am
V. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
In the case of the day from April 8, 2011, Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 2:19 am
On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 2185 This appeal considered whether the case of D v East Berkshire Community NHS Trust [2004] QB 558 is correct and should continue to govern the position of local authorities in respect of their duties to children living in their areas. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 7:55 am
À la suite de ces événements, soit le 2 octobre 2008, Régence met formellement en demeure Naturmania de cesser d'utiliser le nom commercial « Action ». [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:27 am
Regina v Ideal Waste Paper Co Ltd and others: [2011] WLR (D) 370 “The absence of guidance relating to the permissible levels of contamination of waste which could legally be exported did not render criminal proceedings an abuse of process on grounds that the charges were so imprecise as to offend the requirements of the common law and of article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning accessibility and… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:01 am
Eba v Advocate General for Scotland [2011] UKSC 29; [2011] WLR (D) 204 “The approach to judicial review of unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal in Scotland should be to align itself with what had been decided by the Supreme Court to be the approach to be taken in England and Wales. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:20 am
McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-434/09); [2011] WLR (D) 153 “Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC was not applicable to a European Union citizen who had never exercised their right of free movement, who had always resided in a member state of which they were a national and who was also a national of another member state. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:47 am
Fenland District Council v Sheppard and others [2011] EWHC 2829 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 316 “In making a vesting order, pursuant to section 320 of the Insolvency Act 1986, in favour of a statutory chargee whose charge ranked in priority to the mortgagees’ charge over the property, the court was not bound to set aside the mortgagees’ charge where the mortgagees did not themselves apply for a vesting order. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:52 am
Regina (Modaresi) v Secretary of State for Health and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1359; [2011] WLR (D) 340 “The 14-day period allowed to a detained mental patient to lodge an application with the Mental Health Review Tribunal as provided by section 66 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and rule 32(1) the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008 was not to be considered to have expired where, though sent by fax on the last working… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
Mohamed (Azza) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 331; [2012] WLR (D) 92 “The use of the superlative form in the phrase “the most exceptional compassionate circumstances” in paragraph 317(i)(e) of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules (1994) stressed how extreme such circumstances had to be in order for an applicant to be granted indefinite leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as the parent or grandparent aged under 65… [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:29 am
Lane v Cullens Solicitors and others [2011] EWCA Civ 547; [2011] WLR (D) 157 “Where a personal representative had distributed sums out of the relevant estate notwithstanding a notified third party claim against the estate, and sought to sue solicitors in professional negligence, the applicable limitation period could be found to run from the time at which the legal position had altered, viz upon payment out, regardless of the question whether the third party claim was… [read post]
