Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2007, 11:00 pm
Olis said an assistant U.S. attorney took him aside after a hearing and said: " 'Hey, we know you're the small guy on this stuff, plead guilty and you don't owe anybody anything.' " Olis declined, and he and his boss, Gene Foster, and co-worker Helen Sharkey were indicted on June 12. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:12 pm
(And don’t call us “Shirley. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:03 pm
" I don't think one can know for sure at this point that the process isn't going to go in a helpful direction. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Since we're at the summary judgment stage -- for you non-lawyers, that means we don't evaluate who's telling the truth (although we have our suspicions) -- we'll go with plaintiffs' allegations, including that Dr. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:52 am
We have this: Cynthia [defendant's aunt] testified that it was her personal opinion that defendant had committed the crime. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 4:24 pm
"We are aware that Hunt has a less than stellar criminal record, but we reject the dissent's implicit suggestion that Hunt's criminal record should somehow influence our harmless error analysis. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:12 am
Sometimes we anticipate what the trial court will say when it dismisses the case, but you don't know for sure, as the court may dismiss the case on grounds that no one argued, and it may do so on some point that you now realize you cannot get around. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:30 am
And some parents complain of lawyers who don't return phone calls, continually reset hearings or pressure their children to plead guilty to crimes they say they didn't commit. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
We've all banded together to defend their countries against being unfairly bullied by the USTR to adopt failed U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 8:20 pm
As a Massachusetts criminal defense attormey, the answer is no, I don't: I don't at all believe that truly guilty persons, or persons who are proven to be an obvious threat to public safety, should not be incarcerated. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:06 pm
"So don't get me wrong. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
They say your regulation isn't that detailed, that courts don't have to care what you say, and that they should ignore you.Well, as a federal agency, you don't like courts telling you to pound sand. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
But I don't see one. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 8:59 am
And as we have previously noted, Public Citizen got its math wrong, yet Franklin continues to repeat the false statistic without defending or correcting it. 3) Is Judge Pearson poor? [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
We don't need to dive into the bigger questions of when and how immunity should be denied, because it's quite clear it should be denied here, for the two reasons raised by a group of former judges who filed an amicus brief in the case: Application of immunity to judges who admitted under oath to engaging in a criminal scheme that lasted for years would indeed be "monstrous. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:47 am
At trial, the prosecutor in his rebuttal to the defense attorney's closing argument said sarcastically to jurors, "[W]hy don't we send a memo to all drug traffickers" saying "when you hire someone to drive a load, tell them [to say] that they were forced to do it. . . . [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:59 am
We don’t see any conceptual difference between that proffered testimony, and an expert testifying that a product complied – or didn’t comply – with an FDA regulation. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
"Judges and prosecutors need training (note we didn't write "better training" because we don't believe that most judges or prosecutors have any clue as to how unreliable an eyewitness identification really is. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 9:35 am
So now you don't have to explain anything! [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
They don’t have anything else in common. . . . [read post]
