Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe" Results 2261 - 2280 of 2,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
No, (probably) said the Appellate Division, First Department, in its April 6, 2017 decision in Keller-Goldman v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 17-567, denied after two relists, involves the same appointments clause question that the court now faces in Lucia v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Fred Goldsmith
A request for review of the appellate court’s decision was filed with the Supreme Court of California on March 9, 2010.New Jersey Federal District Court: Worker Not Entitled to New Trial on Damages for Pain and SufferingIn Romero v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm by Joshua Smeltzer
Furthermore, the Tax Court found that that the Limited Partner Exception does not apply to a partner who is limited in name only. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am by Andrew Frisch
In the context of an FLSA examination, however, this division of control does not help the nurses’ independent contractor argument because control of the work does not shift to the nurses, it shifts to another entity (which may thereby become a joint employer, Antenor v. [read post]
   If a company’s workers are independent contractors, the company does not have to withhold personal income taxes or pay into federal and state unemployment insurance funds on payments made to those contractors for services rendered. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am by admin
It is a new word and an ugly word, and perhaps it does not mean anything very much. [read post]