Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 2,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
In California v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm
In Azar v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (08-1151) Argued: Dec. 2, 2009 Issue: Whether the state’s legislation to restore storm-eroded beaches along the ocean or lakeshores, modifying the private property boundary line, constitutes a judicial taking or violates the due process clause Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead and Watts, LLP v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:44 pm
Mental Hygiene Law §81.07(g)(1)(v). [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm
The increase will cause tide and storm surge heights to increase and reach further inland, with “moderate” (typically damaging) flooding expected to occur 10 times more often on average than it does today, it said. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 1:23 pm
Doe Texas-Based Oil Company (illegal u-turn collision) $8.7 million – Doe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
In a libel case, the claimant does not have to prove that the publication caused (or even was likely to cause) damage. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm
Department of Treasury. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
This provision does not take effect until the state elects to participate in this section and becomes effective on the later of the date of election or the enactment of this provision. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:10 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
This essay is adapted from his foreword to Eugene Volokh, Sebelius v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
See Nobelman v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:38 am
The appellate court in State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
Roberts rarely writes concurrences; when he does, it’s revealing. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
It states that a cafeteria plan that does not contain written terms that allow changes of election upon change in legal marital status generally would need to be amended before a same-sex couple could be allowed to make an election change. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
In Su v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
No, (probably) said the Appellate Division, First Department, in its April 6, 2017 decision in Keller-Goldman v. [read post]
