Search for: "Patrick v. State" Results 2261 - 2280 of 2,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Claim handlers continue to wrestle with enduring long-tail Exchange Act claims, federal and state Securities Act claims, and shareholder derivative suits without respite. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm by bndmorris
Loewy’s article Cops, Cars, and Citizens: Fixing the Broken Balance was cited in the following article: Henry Patrick, South Dakota v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:30 am by INFORRM
An updated edition of Patrick George’s Defamation Law in Australia included twice as many pages on privacy. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by jonathanturley
That may now occur in West Virginia where Attorney General Patrick Morrisey wants a federal court to throw out a lawsuit attempting to remove Donald Trump from the ballot in the state. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by fjhinojosa
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
id=13796&deptid=5 (stating that the PTO announced a 54% allowance rate). n19. [read post]
8 May 2009, 6:04 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]