Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF Vs." Results 2261 - 2280 of 4,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Always a crime, it has been more difficult for the victims to get traction because they were children, and children are powerless, particularly when their interests are at odds with adults and institutions. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
NESA recently published the findings from its 2016 data and it paints a pretty interesting picture of plagiarism and cheating in the state. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 11:08 am by Paul Cassell
Supreme Court stated in expansive dicta that "in American jurisprudence at least, a private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For Dryer, a 24- minute production, “Game of the Week 1969 Week #1 Vikings vs. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
The FDIC, as receiver for Westernbank, moved to intervene in the state court action, and on December 30, 2011, removed the state court action to the District of Puerto Rico. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
We use variation across lenders (banks vs. independents), state foreclosure laws, and the timing of passage of anti-predatory laws to rule out alternative explanations. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
This has happened in state after state in recent years including New York and Michigan. [read post]
In a case known as the Matter of MMH vs William DH, the court considered a request from the mother for a modification that would give her sole custody and allow her to move to another state. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 8:46 am
(For the difference between factual guilt and legal guilt, see my posts, Factual Guilt vs. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The Court justified comity as: ‘prioritizing citizen protection while taking into account the legitimate interests of foreign claimants. [read post]