Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2010, 9:45 am
United States District Judge Dale S. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:45 am
United States District Judge Dale S. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:54 am
In Bader v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:43 pm
But also, in a parting shot, makes the following statement regarding the position of the attorney for the United States:"The Court notes that Respondent's primary argument â€â [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:46 am
In California v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 12:37 am
Environmental Protection and Information Center v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:20 am
Farms, LLC v. the United States, deals with whether a "physical taking of title" has occurred when a government agency's activities create a risk of flooding. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:30 am
[This is the second installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post: States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:16 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
This morning, I attended the Supreme Court arguments in the cell phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
The case is California Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 4:41 am
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 22 (Dec. 12, 2006) on the case Nagrampa v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:32 am
United Farm Workers National Union, 442 U.S. 289, 298 (1979); Younger v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
In January, we reported that the Supreme Court of the United States granted review in King v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 8:17 am
" Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y. v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:40 am
Under the terms of the settlement, the have agreed to pay the United States and the State of California $14.1 million to settle claims that they violated the False Claims Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:33 am
As we recently reported on our blog, the United States Supreme Court will be reviewing the Ninth Circuit's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 6:42 pm
For example, Amazon argued that it did not set the price for third-party products and therefore cannot “spread the cost of defects across units sold. [read post]
