Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 3:36 pm
(Someday we'd love to see some case law that tells us we have to right to ignore a judge and go about our business.)Now we get to Cynamon's folly: The trial court, on the basis of Billips v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:03 am
My client has no idea that they are lying through their teeth, that they don't have a leg to stand on to hold his wife or his dad. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 11:31 am
But trials are expensive, so if a judge doesn't throw (no pun intended) the case out early it basically forces the defendant to settle. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm
(The Supremes don't like that.)Today we have the Arizona case of Eric Mann. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:21 am
Maybe we just have a surly personality, but we don't think Rothestein will be out through the weekend. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:46 am
This doesn't work at all when a person suffers from mental illness. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 4:45 pm
According to surveys, many Poles say even if he did err as a young man, he is still a hero for what he achieved in the fight for freedom and democracy in the 1980s, our correspondent says.Or in a freer rendering: we don't care what he did back then, he's still big daddy to us now. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 2:55 am
"I don't understand why the DA thinks it's even his call - that's what judges are for, right? [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 12:05 pm
But we emphatically don't want our judges to be autonomous - at least not in the sense of being wholly self-governing or "responding, reacting, or developing independently of the whole". [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:02 am
But I don't know if they will ever go away entirely. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 1:38 am
We have a top 5 list. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:54 am
Again, if we've missed any cases, don't be shy in telling us. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 12:28 am
In rejecting this theory, Judge Baer observed that: While the Rating Agency Defendants may have played a significant role in the ability of other defendants to market the securities at issue, and if we were writing on a clean slate, their liability might be presumed, the fact is we are not writing on a clean slate and, for the moment at least, the law insulates them from exposure under section 11 and they must be dismissed. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
We fully agree that the content, not the medium, is important. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:24 am
"But now we're looking at judges, county clerks, prosecutors--even public defenders. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
And not only Apple's patents: the patents others assert against Apple don't appear to be significantly better. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
But they often don't say that it was second- or third-hand knowledge they are passing off as fact. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 11:27 am
The government would say: "There's a pressing problem we've identified. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
Later, we have posted on rulings on spoliation and a request for default judgment because a witness answered “I don’t know” a number of times. [read post]
22 May 2010, 4:46 am
"You can't see the defendant. [read post]
