Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 4,613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
” Steele v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 3:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:16 am
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects you from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:32 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:59 pm
First, a possible solution is the application of the Coase Theorem, which is well-known to lawyers through its application in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am
National / International News <> House Hearing On "Waters of the United States" Proposal - The House Agriculture Committee, Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry held a hearing on the EPA-Corps of Engineers propoal defining "Waters of the United States" or WOTUS. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 pm
Jones, 61 M.J. 80 (C.A.A.F. 2005); United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
”) Post Grant Admin: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:49 am
Burwell and United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
This reflects a very high degree of cooperation and integration between the EU and Armenia in respect of education. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:21 am
The cases are Cooper v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Shortly after taking office, President Trump issued an Executive Order —entitled “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States”—that directs relevant cabinet officers to deprive sanctuary jurisdictions of federal funding. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 1:46 am
And Korean antitrust law expressly states that an investigative target cannot retaliate against, or give 'any disadvantage' to, another entrepreneur for 'cooperating with investigations' of unfair trade practices. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm
Cir. 2022) Having found the dispute over the ’562 patent moot, the court next considered the proper disposition—whether to simply dismiss the appeal or also vacate the PTAB decision under United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:01 am
Despite its constitutional provenance and majestic grandeur, the Supreme Court of the United States operates like any other court. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
One such case is United States v. [read post]
