Search for: "Land v. State" Results 2281 - 2300 of 13,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2012, 4:06 am
The highest court in the land, the United States Supreme Court, should render a decision on this same issue early next year in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 4:17 pm by NARF
McCullough (Lithium Mining; Federal Land Policy and Management Act; National Historic Preservation Act)State of Texas v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 2:58 pm by NARF
Sattgast (Tribal Sovereignty; State Taxation) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2022.html Rodgers v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 2:10 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Piper (Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act - Notice)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html In re G.V. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:32 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
April 12, 2018) (putative class action removed from South Carolina state court brought under the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act against Blue Max for allegedly requiring employees to work “off the clock” and failing to pay all wages due) Hogan, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:32 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
April 12, 2018) (putative class action removed from South Carolina state court brought under the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act against Blue Max for allegedly requiring employees to work “off the clock” and failing to pay all wages due) Hogan, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:32 pm by Amanda Pickens
April 12, 2018) (putative class action removed from South Carolina state court brought under the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act against Blue Max for allegedly requiring employees to work “off the clock” and failing to pay all wages due) Hogan, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:20 am
The complaint (full text) in New York State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:39 pm by Eduardo Penalver
In Koontz, the state had coupled discussions of in-kind exactions from Koontz's own land with proposals that he pay for mitigation elsewhere on the state's own land. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:41 am by Pauline M.K. Young
Montclair State asserted this position largely based upon the 1972 New Jersey Supreme Court case of Rutgers v. [read post]