Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
There, Lord Hoffmann questioned the appropriateness of the term deference in describing the relationship between the courts and other branches of state within the separation of powers. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:39 pm
Lord Citation: 2009 WY 135 Docket Number: S-08-0225 Appeal from the District Court of Uinta County, Honorable Dennis L. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:57 am
He approved Lord Bingham’s comments in R v Cambridge Health Authority ex parte B [1995] 1 WLR 898, when he stated: I have no doubt that in a perfect world any treatment which a patient… sought would be provided if doctors were willing to give it, no matter how much it costs… It would however, in my view, be shutting one’s eyes to the real world… It is common knowledge that health authorities of all kinds are constantly pressed to make ends… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
Israel: State Prosecutor Moshe Lador has apologized to former prime minister Ehud Olmert in a libel action which Olmert had issued against him. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
In Bright Lord Judge CJ cited from Lord Camden CJ’s judgment in Entick v Carrington and from William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
In the words of Lord Atkinson in Adam v.Ward [1917] AC 309 at 334. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:39 am
Lord Scarman [in Pao On v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Furthermore, Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Pepper v Hart said that Article IX was ‘a provision of the highest constitutional importance’ which ‘should not be narrowly construed’. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
Last Monday the US Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari in the Costco Wholesale Corp v Omega SA case. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
Applying the House of Lords decision in Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impregilo SpA [2005] UKHL 43, Tomlinson J held that an error of law does not involve an excess of power under section 68(2)(b) of the Act. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 11:29 pm
This “imminent risk” approach was essentially endorsed by the House of Lords in 2009. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
The duplication was made manifest, rather than avoided, by the fact each expert repeatedly stated that he agreed with passages in the other expert's reports. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
John Catt has indicated that he will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights – historically the court has been far stricter on the requirement of accordance with the law and therefore far less willing to allow the state wide discretionary powers where privacy and surveillance are concerned, resulting in a series of rulings against the UK – see Malone v UK (1984), Hewitt v UK (1992), Liberty & Others v UK (2008), S &… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:24 pm
A similar law was declared by the House of Lords to be incompatible with the British Human Rights Act, 1998 in A v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am
In the course of appeal’s hearing Vedanta argued that allowing cases against English multinationals in their home state was not in the public interest. [read post]
