Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 12,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Science, but God v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:48 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:29 am
Nuvasive, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – February 1st, 2018) involves a claim of securities fraud. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:21 am
In DirecTV v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:01 pm
The case made its way to the US Supreme Court after losing in the Supreme Court of California and the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
California and in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:02 pm
” Critics cite a 1960 Supreme Court case, Talley v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
The moving defendant’s burden is to demonstrate that the act or acts of which the plaintiff complains were taken ‘in furtherance of the defendant’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue,’ as defined in the statute. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:43 am
In Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:43 am
In Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:35 pm
The Court of Appeal affirms.The best case for the plaintiff was probably a Ninth Circuit case, applying California law, that held that the United States was liable for the sexual assault by an immigration officer on an applicant for asylum. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
Hassid, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a California state regulation granting labor organizations a limited “right to take access” to agricultural employers’ property constitutes a per se physical taking. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 pm
Today’s opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:28 am
Blue Diamond Growers, the plaintiff brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to certify a nationwide class of consumers who purchased Blue Diamond almond milk products containing allegedly false and deceptive labels. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:23 pm
See 36 U.S.C. sec. 110.)Flag Day is not a state holiday in California (see Gov. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Courts throughout the country have recognized the principle that small increments of time are not compensable, including the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
