Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2015, 8:26 am
We're entering entirely uncharted waters. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm
(The Supremes don't like that.)Today we have the Arizona case of Eric Mann. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Since we're at the summary judgment stage -- for you non-lawyers, that means we don't evaluate who's telling the truth (although we have our suspicions) -- we'll go with plaintiffs' allegations, including that Dr. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:57 am
" The Court notes that a federal lawsuit alleging tortious conduct by police testifying as prosecution witnesses in the state case provides the good faith basis for raising the issue.So when you are considering cross-examination of a police officer, don't forget to check PACER and County Clerk records. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:52 am
Don't look for me or Bruce Braley on the Supreme Court anytime soon. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 11:27 am
The government would say: "There's a pressing problem we've identified. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 4:24 pm
"We are aware that Hunt has a less than stellar criminal record, but we reject the dissent's implicit suggestion that Hunt's criminal record should somehow influence our harmless error analysis. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:45 pm
" Which runs afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment's protections against laws that don't give fair warning of what is and isn't prohibited. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:06 pm
"So don't get me wrong. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 4:45 pm
According to surveys, many Poles say even if he did err as a young man, he is still a hero for what he achieved in the fight for freedom and democracy in the 1980s, our correspondent says.Or in a freer rendering: we don't care what he did back then, he's still big daddy to us now. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:40 am
But let's hope that we don't end up with a mess in design patents as a result. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
We all are . . . but I'll strive to do better. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 9:35 am
So now you don't have to explain anything! [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
"Judges and prosecutors need training (note we didn't write "better training" because we don't believe that most judges or prosecutors have any clue as to how unreliable an eyewitness identification really is. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
-Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, no pet.), we rejected an argument identical to Kirk's. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:59 am
We don’t see any conceptual difference between that proffered testimony, and an expert testifying that a product complied – or didn’t comply – with an FDA regulation. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 6:56 am
Judges don't clarify their judgments in public, and their private clarifications don't carry weight. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
But they often don't say that it was second- or third-hand knowledge they are passing off as fact. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
It’s possible—though for reasons we’ll explain, we think unlikely—that Judge Emmet G. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
When I started in the jury trial business, back when we scrawled our trial briefs on the cave walls and juries deliberated around the campfire, one of my mentors, who had successfully tried hundreds of cases, gave me a golden rule: "When you speak to the jury, don't ever apologize for anything. [read post]
