Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 2301 - 2320
of 3,933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2018, 5:50 am
Campaign Finance National: “Trump’s Inaugural Committee Paid $26 Million to Firm of First Lady’s Adviser” by Maggie Haberman and Kenneth Vogel for New York Times New York: “Citizens United Can’t Hide Donor Lists from NY” by Nick Rummell for Courthouse News Service Texas: “Austinites May Soon Be Able to Directly Support Candidates Through Voucher Donations” by Jessi Devenyns for Austin Monitor Elections National: “Mueller… [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
., Feb. 26, 2010) (in rem jurisdiction over domain names); A comment Citizens United and its Impact on the Internet. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 10:30 am
I hope that Congress will give this legislation the swift consideration it deserves, which is especially urgent now in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
Addressing this argument in the decision, District Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote, “The [FEC] cannot unilaterally decide to take on a quintessentially legislative function; if sound policy suggests that the statute needs tailoring in the wake of WRTL or Citizens United, it is up to Congress to do it. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
, both by Lucian Bebchuk and Robert Jackson (discussed on the Forum here and here), and Corporate Politics, Governance, and Value Before and after Citizens United by John C. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
There’s nothing fancy, and nothing we already didn’t know, but the post sums up the trouble with Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:15 pm
Lyle’s post on the petition filed today in the “sequel” to Citizens United. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 10:50 pm
Also interesting is what's to happen with the Montana case trashing Citizens United. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 1:18 pm
Ravel again joined the three Republican commissioners to pass the rules, which were created in response to the 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:18 am
(The report needs a little clarification: Citizens United v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:22 pm
In Citizens United, the Court rejected the idea that resources from the economic marketplace should not be deployed in the political marketplace—a position Smith evidently supports. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 7:27 am
" The name — Progressives United — is a play on Citizens United, the case that found a law with Feingold's name on it unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
” At Casetext, David Boyle argues that “if a candidate wants the vote of thinking people, it might be best if that candidate weren’t advocating an amendment diminishing the Supreme Court and overturning Citizens United—especially if the candidate’s name is Hillary Clinton. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
Overrule Citizens United! [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:15 am
This old question has become new again with public outrage over Citizens United, the recent campaign finance case which expanded corporate constitutional speech rights. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:35 pm
The video of John Roberts, talking about the SOTU, is now available: WaPo says: Wednesday, Senate Democrats followed up with pointed criticism of Roberts, and at a hearing on the decision, a leading Democrat said the American public had "rightfully recoiled" from the ruling [in Citizens United].... [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:35 pm
Rev. 941 (2011) [PDF] Notes Francis Bingham, Show Me the Money: Public Access and Accountability After Citizens United, 52 B.C. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:40 am
At the Bench Memos blog of the National Review Online, Ed Whelan has three blog posts challenging Jeffrey Toobin’s recent story for the New Yorker on Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:39 am
Our opponents have applauded the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United and welcomed the new flow of special interest money with open arms. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:33 am
This continues an ongoing cycle where groups are suing states, and obtaining mixed results, for the state’s disclosure laws based on the Supreme Court’s landmark Citizens United decision in 2010. [read post]
