Search for: "Blog Editorial"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 5,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2017, 3:59 pm
For a more detail analysis of the case, check Rebecca Tushnet’s blog entry. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:28 pm
Commentators and editorial boards have weighed in on the decision as well. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:59 pm
For a more detail analysis of the case, check Rebecca Tushnet’s blog entry. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:33 pm
Please see below for further information.In addition to a call for submissions for the Journal, the Editorial Board would like to invite authors to submit c. 1000 word commentaries for our new online blog (available at www.cjicl.org.uk), by e-mailing them to: blog@cjicl.org.uk with your name, institution and submission in a separate word (.doc) or richtext (.rtf) document.Andrew Sanger and Rumiana YotovaEditors in Chief of the Cambridge Journal of International and… [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:00 pm
Individual bloggers have complete editorial freedom to write about any and all topics that pertain to the particular blog(s) they write about. [read post]
23 May 2018, 5:21 am
Lewis on my firm’s blog, Employment Law Letter, that you can access here. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:36 pm
This is because Article 2 sub c of the Framework Directive (2002/21/EC), which contains some ofthe general definitions for the regulatory framework over "electronic communications services", explicitly excludes services providing or exercising editorial control over content. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:22 pm
For some info on how it gets done, read through Evan Schaeffer’s 2006 entry on how he did it; I use it for guidance alongside the obligatory dose of editorial discretion. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:44 am
To the IAM blog as to its post titled Where is the outrage? [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
This blog’s Amy Howe explains the Court’s orders in plain English. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:35 pm
Lesser used resources include podcasts (7%) and law-related blogs or “blawgs” (25.1%). [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:58 am
” The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal calls the court’s refusal to hear the cases “disappointing whatever the reasons,” maintaining that “[i]f the Justices duck every case remotely implicating gender politics, substantive constitutional issues will go unresolved and individual rights may be impaired. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View; Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog; Roger Pilon at the Cato Institute; Emma Green of The Atlantic; Amanda Marcotte at Slate; Jonathan Keim at National Review; Mark Tushnet of Balkinization; Amanda Terkel for the Huffington Post; Matthew Schettenhelm for the IMLA; Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg; Ed Whelan at National Review; Ed Mannino on his personal blog; Sally Kohn of the Daily Beast; Simon Waxman at… [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:18 am
’” Additional commentary comes from Ernie Haffner at his eponymous blog, the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal, and Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, who notes that the dissent “closed with a foretaste of the next battle in the majority’s arbitration offensive: … Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964[, ] which covers sex discrimination on the job. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
Lisa Heinzerling previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Ryke Longest previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
Tuesday's orders are still dominating the news and blog headlines. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:16 am
A recent editorial by Mr. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 7:01 pm
I am delighted to introduce Tayyab Mahmud who will be blogging with us for the next month. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:45 pm
So I was interested to see a couple of headlines this week here and yon promoting early education policies that seem likely to reduce crime:Editorial: Perry should sign pre-K billOfficials: Early Education Effort Cuts CrimeThe editorial, by United Way of Texas President Karen Johnson, quoted a study out of Texas A&M which "found that for every $1 invested in high-quality pre-k, at least $3.50 is returned to Texas communities. [read post]
