Search for: "Fields v. United States"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 5,470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest." [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:47 am
Note also that the Court’s fractured decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
Likewise there is an almost obsessive interest in patent litigation in the United States, where the subject lies somewhere between a cottage industry and an art form, with ever-shifting guidance concerning injunctions, damages, patent eligibility and the interrelationship of patent suits with the sale price of patents singly or in bundles. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
This aspect of Steel Seizure highlights what is particularly problematic about Obama’s decision to aggregate authorities in the sanctions laws and to commit the United States to an across-the-board waiver of nuclear sanctions against Iran. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
" Nomm agreed to waive his extradition hearing in the Netherlands, where he was arrested in January 2012, and plead guilty in the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am
<> EPA Awarding Close to $13 Million to Assist Small Drinking Water and Wastewater Systems Across the United States - U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow: "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:18 am
In light of highly destructive recent court decisions like Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
Having moved back to the United Kingdom, I'd like to start my career and gain experience within the field prior to starting the LPC, either through a training contract or independently. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Over 50 members of congress have signed a letter asking USDA to keep genetically engineered alfalfa out of commercial use in light of the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 10:35 am
’s] blood, after a fatal, suspected DUI motor vehicle accident, on the basis of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 10:26 am
”)While recognizing a very narrow preclusive presidential power that prohibits Congress from contradicting a position the President has previously taken on the political recognition of a foreign government, the Zivotofsky Court calls into fatal question its 1936 discussion in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 4:52 pm
Three years later in the case of Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 8:06 am
Three years later in the case of Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Board of Education (1954) in the United States; Reference re Secession of Quebec (1998) in Canada; Décision Liberté d'association (1971) in France; the Lüth Judgment (1958) in Germany; and S v Makwanyane and Another (1995) in South Africa.Landmark judgments in constitutional cases invite numerous questions that can benefit from comparative analysis. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:21 am
” Henry v Detroit, 234 Mich App 405, 410; 594 NW2d 107 (1999). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 am
Anyone connected to the world of law is no doubt aware of the passing away over the weekend of Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]