Search for: "Toler v. State" Results 2301 - 2320 of 3,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  But, assuming that a majority do indicate a clear desire to join the Union as a state, there is still the question whether the GOP would tolerate such a result, given the fact that Puerto Rico would be entitled to at least four and probably five representatives as well, of course, as two senators, all of whom would be very likely to be Democrats given the Trump/GOP indifference to Puerto Rico following Maria. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 2:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
  “The state, in short, has treated [the florist] with neither tolerance nor respect. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:48 am by Amy Howe
It is particularly important, Trump argues, that the president be immune from state and local prosecution while he is in office, because the “risk that politics will lead state and local prosecutors to relentlessly harass the President is too great to tolerate. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:40 am by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes decisions published during August 2019 by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that are of interest to state practitioners [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Welcome
Under it, topics such as “Administrative suspension 322.2616 (zero tolerance),” “Probable Cause Affidavits,” and “Statistics for your area and your agency” were included. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am by Sarah Libowsky, Krista Oehlke
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
Hardeep Singh is a freelance journalist and was the defendant in His Holiness v Singh. [read post]