Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 39,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2014, 3:23 pm
Gallo v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 7:43 am
To non-lawyers, this ruling may be baffling. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:40 pm
[Post by Venkat] Asis Internet Servs. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 3:44 am
Judge Sean Cox’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:23 pm
Which holds, in a split opinion, that even though the Unfair Competition Law permits a district attorney to bring a lawsuit in the name of the People of the State of California (and obtain relief on behalf of everyone injured), the law doesn't actually do that, and a local DA is instead limited to civil UCL claims in its own jurisdiction.There's something to be said for the majority view. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 8:44 am
People v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:26 am
See State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:10 am
On the facts alleged, defendant’s knowledge and intent may not be imputed solely by his mere possession of the forged document (see People v Rodriguez, 17 NY3d at 489; People v Bailey, 13 NY3d 67, 71-72 [2009]). [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:10 am
On the facts alleged, defendant’s knowledge and intent may not be imputed solely by his mere possession of the forged document (see People v Rodriguez, 17 NY3d at 489; People v Bailey, 13 NY3d 67, 71-72 [2009]). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:29 pm
May 31, 2012). [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
Wrong, according to a lot of people. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
People v Sivells and People v Arotin held that a sex offender making an application for a downward departure bears the burden of establishing his or her entitlement to relief. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:27 am
Fischer v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 12:32 am
The opinion below is People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:28 am
Such discussions may, for example, facilitate prostitution by providing sex workers and others with tools to ensure the receipt of payment for sexual services. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:44 pm
Justice Edelmann, in West Vancouver (District), v. [read post]
