Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 2321 - 2340 of 6,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2020, 8:38 am by Florian Mueller
I don't know what they can and will do in Dusseldorf, but should my constitutional rights not be respected on Thursday, I will definitely seek advice from lawyers specialized in constitutional law. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Hence, one might read Neagle as implicitly adopting a Supremacy Clause defense that is likewise deferential to federal authority.I don't read Neagle that way. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
I think it hinders our ability to have unbiased juries.These shows don't seem to be going anywhere, so the debate over the existence of a "CSI Effect" is sure to go on. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:03 am by SHG
  We do it because we must, because if we don't, then who will stand between the accused and the mighty. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 8:45 am by Steve Kalar
Image of the Honorable Judge Clifford Wallace from http://www.iclrs.org/content//events/presenters/4f0625e2d6476.jpgSteven Kalar, Federal Public Defender N.D. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:26 am by Jeff Gamso
  They don't have the luxury of saying, "Well, shucks, the odds here suck so he's got a better chance if we just don't do anything. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:10 pm by Florian Mueller
""By lowering the bar for non-obviousness, there's a real risk that patents will issue that don't deserve patent protection, that there will be additional litigation. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Those are the kinds of information we really like to know from prescribers - how they judge the science; how they judge the drug; and how they judge the company. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:48 am by Dan
*   *   *   * But elected benches are by nature glaringly "fishy" (i.e., "...dang, Nadine, the campaign money to the judge last year...just don't seem right...the dog don't hunt... [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:04 am
Obama would be a fool to appoint extreme, left-wing judges, and I don't think he is a fool. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 8:01 am by Eric Goldman
They dont seem to care about whether defendant actually did the infringing, or about developing the law. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:37 am
Beyond the fact that it most likely isn't true, there isn't a solid legal reason to be handling a large quantity of cocaine. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:30 am by Kevin
""[W]e don't want to be draconian," said the ranger, explaining why the county felt it was necessary to take this matter to trial, "but we [also] don't want people walking in a corridor of feces. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 11:14 am
And the defendants, our government, has arguments about the legality of the program that don't rely on secrets (but do rely on incorrect legal arguments). [read post]