Search for: "Eugene Volokh"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 8,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2011, 10:32 am
(Eugene Volokh) The post below will, I suspect, lead many people to want to discuss this question — a question that strikes me as quite interesting — so I thought I’d set up a separate thread for this general issue. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:50 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A North Carolina statute, § 163–274(a)(6), makes it a misdemeanor “to discharge or threaten to discharge from employment ... any legally qualified voter on account of any vote such voter may cast or consider or intend to cast. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:06 am
(Eugene Volokh) Bluman v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 8:25 am
(Eugene Volokh) I just came across the word “mandamused” in a court opinion, so I did a couple of Westlaw searches — “mandamused” yields 238 hits, going back to the 1880s, and “mandamusing” yields 35 hits. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:05 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From squid314: As I mentioned in my last entry, I’ve been watching Babylon 5 lately. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:37 am
(Eugene Volokh) I’ve been using this word a lot in my first-semester Criminal Law and Torts classes, and finally one student had the nerve to ask me what it meant. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:59 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting post from Prof. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:23 am
(Eugene Volokh) Rifqa Bary, about whom I blogged before, is the 17-year-old girl from a Muslim family in America who ran away from home, claiming her father had threatened to “hurt her, kill her or send her back to Sri Lanka” because she had converted to Christianity. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 12:00 pm
Orin Kerr, Daniel Solove, and Eugene Volokh are debating the question of why it seems that judges are citing fewer law review articles. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:11 am
Eugene Volokh and Scott Greenfield worry that free speech could be the loser from a buzz of law school interest in the topic of "cyber-stalking" or "cyber-harassment" - rather broadly couched in one description to include law students' "using websites to make outrageous gender- or race-specific comments. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:27 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Apropos the post about the New Jersey homeowners’ association case, here’s a quick summary, as of a few years ago, of the approaches taken by the few states that have applied their state free speech clauses to limit not just government action but also some private landowner action: 1. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:54 am
(Eugene Volokh) In Apolinar v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:08 am
(Eugene Volokh) Prof. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 7:39 pm
Over at the VC, Eugene Volokh has an excellent post criticizing convictions of individuals under state wiretapping laws for secretly recording their encounters with the police. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 10:25 am
Following up on my recent post on Judge Kozinski, I wanted to pass along more information from Eugene Volokh (who clerked for Judge Kozinski) that puts the situation into much better context than the original LA Times article I quoted from earlier:A lawyer (Cyrus Sanai) who has long had a grudge against Judge Kozinski finds out that the Kozinski family has a network server with various files on it. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
If you don’t believe me, even Eugene Volokh gushes about Hansen a bit here. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 4:56 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Ben Smith (Politico) writes, apropos the newspaper story I noted and asked our readers about a few days ago: The White House is denying a story in the Israeli newspaper Maariv ... that Israeli nuclear scientists have been denied visas to visit the United States.... [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:17 am
Eugene Volokh provides us this splendid example of how not to write a petition for rehearing, which he got from Paul Milligan at Lowering the Bar.The petition states that the court failed to address the key issues. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
Steve Bainbridge and co-blogger Eugene Volokh ask whether states are permitted to use eminent domain to take federal land. [read post]
1 May 2007, 7:26 am
Eugene Volokh (Apr. 30) believes that as interpreted by the regulatory board, at least, the Arizona statute is probably "constitutionally overbroad". [read post]
