Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
The House of Lords decision in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Lord v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
The Gray v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor case - see below. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:54 am
It’s time to reread Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke [1969] 1 AC 645 (PC) [especially the judgment of Lord Reid] [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:25 am
Ancon Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:41 am
The Albufeira Judicial Court had refused to allow the applicant to call alibi witnesses: it was stated that the applicant had had enough witnesses and there was no time to call more witnesses. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
The Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals annoucement on new COVID-19 restrictions for England (1 November 2020). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am
In answer to a Written Question in the Lords from Lord Pickles as to why the Government has committed to legislating for outdoor religious marriages outside of wholesale reform of marriage law [HL4172], Lord Bellamy, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at MoJ, replied as follows: “As part of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic, in which the circumstances were exceptional, the Government accelerated legislation to allow outdoor civil weddings and civil… [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 7:06 am
Lord Woolman is the presiding judge in the present claim of M.Wilson v North Lanarkshire Council & Others (A1628/01). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
From the Land of the Glens comes the judgment of the Glennie in the form of Schuh Limited v Shhh... [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
In 2004, British Law Lord Johan Steyn famously called Guantanamo a “legal black hole. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:17 am
In Sim v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:09 am
But no UK patent ruling has ever been even remotely as controversial as Justice Colin Birss's 2017 holding in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:23 am
As Kat readers may recall, in May 2015, the UK Supreme Court ruled in the case of Starbucks (HK) v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:37 pm
Ltd & Rhodia Operations S.A.S. v Neo Chemicals and Oxides Limited & Neo Performance Materials Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:37 am
In Amerisure Insurance Co. v. [read post]
