Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 11,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2016, 5:15 am
San Francisco – House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi today released the following statement on a bicameral amicus brief of 105 Members of Congress and 23 Senators in the case of Christiansen v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
I got this case confused with Terry v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:33 pm
Earlier this year in Collins v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:00 pm
Ware v People’s Counsel for Baltimore County, 2015 WL 4067997 (MD 7/2/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.mdcourts.gov/opinions/cosa/2015/1008s14.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Zoning - Interpretation [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:45 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:48 am
Clancy v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:01 pm
But as I reflect on the recent Supreme Court decision in McDonald v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:21 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:43 am
In what was billed as a major address yesterday by the White House, President Joe Biden declared that, if the Democrats prevail in the midterm elections, “here’s the promise I make to you and the American people: The first bill I will send to the Congress will be to codify Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
In FCC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:29 pm
After they talked to the people inside, they noticed that the gun case was gone. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:43 pm
UNITED STATES V. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm
By: Rachel V. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
As Wikipedia notes, the amendment states that [t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[ [emphasis added]. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 5:30 am
Obviously, if a candidate who does not support DAPA and DACA wins the White House, these programs will never see the light of day. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 5:30 am
Obviously, if a candidate who does not support DAPA and DACA wins the White House, these programs will never see the light of day. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 5:27 am
We must provide the people with a vision of the future. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
The New York Court of Appeals, in State v. [read post]
