Search for: "ALLISON v. STATE" Results 221 - 240 of 487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2010, 11:17 pm by Ben Vernia
In February, Judge Roberts had denied the company’s motion – which had been brought on grounds that the government’s complaint failed to state a cause of action for using a false document to get a claim paid or approved in violation of 31 U.S.C § 3729(a)(2), as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Allison Engine Co., Inc. v. [read post]
There was disagreement on the reasoning, but only two members of the 16-judge en banc panel dissented that the state’s permit process is constitutional, despite the Supreme Court’s significant expansion of gun rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:21 am
In this case, “V” stands for “Violence” and also “Vivisection. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Executive Power After United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
McAdams, Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v Hollingsworth, 74 U Chi L Rev 1795 (2007) Thomas J. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
" Derogatory, The Practical Standard Dictionary of the English Language (1936); see also State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
On this week’s National Security Law Podcast, Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck closed out 2018 with a deep dive into the state secrets privilege: Zach ZhenHe Tan surveyed the impact of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jesner v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by Kyle Wallor
”   In 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided Allison Engine Co., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:43 am by John Jascob
This year, the gathering of industry compliance and legal professionals heard the usual updates on CFTC enforcement actions and NFA regulatory matters, but also had the opportunity to learn about the intersection of antitrust and derivatives law, ethical issues implicated in regulatory investigations, and lessons on aggressive courtroom tactics from a lawyer who took on the DOJ in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
"[18]   The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19]  Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:46 pm
Arizona District Court Rules Website Targeting Plaintiff Does Not Create Jurisdiction in Plaintiff's Home State Allison Pedrazzi Helfrich (Stanford Law School) has, on the CIS-website, posted a case review of decision 2008 WL 5235373. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Maryland Matters, Allison Stephens notes that “[b]attles over partisan gerrymandering are poised to shift to the states in the wake of a major U.S. [read post]