Search for: "Adam Winkler"
Results 221 - 240
of 294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2016, 11:21 am
Second Amendment scholar Adam Winkler cautions gun-control groups, for example, that even a Supreme Court with a liberal majority is not likely to overturn District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:44 am
University of Texas at Austin continues with Roger Clegg’s response to a post by David Gans and Adam Winkler. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Adam Winkler, Free Speech Federalism, 9 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (2007). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
Monday, Oct. 10 Adam Winkler, JD, a specialist in American constitutional law and professor of law at the UCLA School of Law, will deliver “Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America” in the trial courtroom, 309 Anheuser-Busch Hall. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
In an op-ed published in the New York Times, Adam Winkler, a professor at the U.C.L.A. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
Adam Winkler, a specialist in gun policy at the UCLA School of Law, made a similar argument. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 am
Commentary on and analysis of the hearings comes from Richard Eskow at OurFuture, William Yeomans at ACSBlog, Adam Winkler, also at ACS Blog, Advice and Consent (podcast), David Fontana at Prawfsblawg, Christopher Ingraham in The Washington Post, Jay Michaelson in The Daily Beast, Robert Schlesinger at US News and World Report, Paul Callan at CNN, and Sen. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
University of Texas on behalf of some of the nation’s leading constitutional law scholars, including Professors Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, Eric Schnapper, and Adam Winkler, as bad, revisionist history. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:30 pm
(Side note: consider a possibly parallel question of the constitutional interests that corporations may vindicate, as explored here by Adam Winkler--that these might be conceptually parallel tends to be missed, and I haven't seen any "States aren't people" bumper stickers.) [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:16 am
(Side note: consider a possibly parallel question of the constitutional interests that corporations may vindicate, as explored here by Adam Winkler--that these might be conceptually parallel tends to be missed, and I haven't seen any "States aren't people" bumper stickers.) [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 8:09 am
Winkler, and Deputy Chief Mark R. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 3:29 pm
The Virginia Compromise supports University of California at Los Angeles professor Adam Winkler’s observation that gun rights and gun regulation can be compatible. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars—Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, Eric Schnapper, and Adam Winkler—demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit the government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:43 am
I think that’s factually right (and some pro-gun-control liberals, such as my colleague Adam Winkler, agree). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars – Bruce Ackerman, Vikram Amar, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, and Adam Winkler – demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 12:50 pm
(More on this point can be found in Adam Winkler’s new book, We the Corporations, about the corporate civil rights movement. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:14 am
Lawrence, William Van Alstyne, Adam Winkler (none of whom are dreaded libertarians, so far as I know) and my reading of the Privileges or Immunities Clause is wrong? [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am
The constitutional scholars amicus brief which advocated the same libertarian view of the Privileges or Immunities Clause was signed by such notables as Richard Aynes, Jack Balkin, Randy Barnett, Steven Calabresi, Michael Curtis, Michael Lawrence, William Van Alstyn and Adam Winkler. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:58 pm
Meanwhile, my friend and UCLA law colleague Adam Winkler thinks that Kagan's lack of judicial experience could be a major stumbling block, and that the nomination could end up hurting Obama: Her opponents are casting her as inexperienced because she has never been a judge and only practiced law for a few years, and that line of attack has purchase with the American people. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:58 pm
For good measure, he could likewise authorize the entire White House staff, or indeed every single employee of the United States government, to also carry a concealed pistol in D.C.As the Moody article points out, President Perry could ask the D.C. police to deputize him, in order to take advantage of the D.C. law allowing the police to carry guns, but President Perry would have no practical need to ask the D.C. police to use their discretion to grant him the ability to do something he can do… [read post]
