Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 221 - 240
of 469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:10 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 2:46 pm
Further, “[f]or many projects, a qualitative analysis of construction traffic may be appropriate. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:41 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:09 am
(Citing Callahan, 42 F.4th at 1021.) [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 9:16 am
(As a matter of disclosure, Respondent County of Lake was represented in the trial and appellate proceedings in this case by this post’s authors, Miller Starr Regalia attorneys Arthur Coon and Matthew Henderson.) [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:03 pm
I recall that Mike Zischke, co-author of CEB’s excellent CEQA treatise, used to be fond of saying the “normal” or “usual rules” for analyzing cumulative impacts should apply to analysis of a project’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under CEQA. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
In a 47-page published decision filed June 17, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition, and held that Respondent Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (“Agency”) must comply with CEQA before “refining” its Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (“MSHCP”) to exclude a 200-acre parcel of ranch land owned by Anheuser-Busch, LLC (“Busch”) from its protections against… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
(Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Appendix F.) [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:22 am
Resources Code, §§ 21159.21(f), 21159.22(b)(3), 21159.23(a)(2)(A), 21159.24(a)(1), (3), 21155.1(a)(4)(B)) also constitute “exceptions to the general rule that CEQA [does] not require an evaluation of existing hazards on future users of a proposed project. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
(providing that “[i]f possible, a well should be located outside areas of flooding”; and 9 (requiring a well’s “annular space” be “effectively sealed” and establishing minimum subface seal depths). [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
And although the [F]EIR at least offered some figures about current and anticipated VMT around Lake Tahoe, it never clearly explained how all of these figures related to the Lake. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 11:13 am
” (CRC, rule 1.100(f).) [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 11:18 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
As all CEQA practitioners know, a prospective petitioner in a writ proceeding challenging a CEQA determination must first exhaust available administrative remedies as a prerequisite to filing suit. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]