Search for: "Bailey v. Bailey" Results 221 - 240 of 1,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2008, 3:42 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cantrell v Wycombe District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 866 (29 July 2008) Bailey v The Ministry of Defence & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 883 (29 July 2008) Blyth Valley Borough Council v Persimmon Homes (North East) Ltd & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 861 (29 July 2008) Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council v Bainbridge & Ors (”Bainbridge 1″) [2008] EWCA Civ 885 (29 July 2008) G, R (on the… [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:36 am by J
HHJ Bailey (Central London CC) has just sent Croydon v Kalonga D03CR038 to the High Court for a trial on the very issue. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 7:24 am
Fysh slips through net of design right claimsBailey and Bailey v Haynes and Haynes, a Patents County Court decision of Judge Michael Fysh QC from 2 October, has been summarised on the Sweet & Maxwell Lawtel subscription service. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:11 am
Slip Opinion No.People v Bailey Ind. 8766/00 2007 NY Slip Op 06789People v Colon Ind. 4153/00 2007 NY Slip Op 06790Buder v City of New York Index 6269/06 2007 NY Slip Op 06791People v Gonzalez Ind. 2625/05 2007 NY Slip Op 06792People v Hart Ind. 893/01 2007 NY Slip Op 06793Jill S. v… [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am by David Smith
Seaport Investments Limited, Seymore Henry Sweeney Carol Sweeney v Andrew Cameron, Mitchell Bailey, John Crooks and the Attorney-General [1999] NIQB 1943 This case concerns rights of way across a property near the Giant's Causeway known as Runkerry House. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am by David Smith
Seaport Investments Limited, Seymore Henry Sweeney Carol Sweeney v Andrew Cameron, Mitchell Bailey, John Crooks and the Attorney-General [1999] NIQB 1943 This case concerns rights of way across a property near the Giant's Causeway known as Runkerry House. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:11 am by Walter Olson
Ted Frank, crusader against class action abuse and formerly a contributor to this blog, profiled [Caleb Hannan, Bloomberg] Judge: “Milberg attorneys engaged in an elaborate scheme of deceptive conduct” in qui tam relator case [Bailey McGowan/WLF, opinion in Leysock v. [read post]