Search for: "Bird v. Justice Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2009, 11:39 am
The court's opinion was authored by Justice Paul Green. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
With Justice Stephen Breyer expected to retire at the end of this term, California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger is one of the frontrunners to succeed him. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:41 pm
Justice Keith M. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:12 pm
The claim at issue here was rejected in 1985 by the Rose Bird California Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Bullock, Senior Attorney, Institute for Justice--Robert Entman, J.B. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:46 am
Yesterday, the Connecticut Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The Sebelius v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
The Supreme Court released an opinion today in Voisine v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
(Contrary to myth, Anderson was decided five years before Jerry Brown appointed Rose Bird to the Court. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
The General Court answers this question in Joined Cases T-707/13 and T-709/13, which Valentina reports.* Green around the gills? [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:18 pm
The Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling in Garland v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 12:19 pm
It seems that the Court of Justice of the European Union's Translation Unit has finally managed to catch up with itself. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:57 pm
Three Georgia Supreme Court Justices dissented, meaning they didn't agree with the majority (the other four Justices). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The courts that do require subjective intent often rely on the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Virginia v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Early Bird Standard = £510 Early Bird Group Ticket / IBIL Sponsor / UCL alumni = £433.50 Standard fee = £600 Standard Group Ticket / IBIL Sponsor / UCL alumni = £510 More information: here Fashion Law Seminar: Common Law v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:47 am
(Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [1st Dept 2017].) [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Mr Justice Donald Binchy has now published a redacted judgment [pdf]. [read post]
