Search for: "Bush v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Free Trade v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:06 pm
Office of Personnel Management, Judge Vanessa Bryant of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut found Section 3 of DOMA to violate equal protection. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:51 am
As is often the case with 3-judge panels, one jurist stays poker-faced; this time, it was Bush appointee, Judge Jeffery Sutton.Since the SCOTUS decision in United States v Windsor, nearly every state's federal court system has cultivated a same-sex marriage case, usually challenging the constitutionality of a state law that bans or limits the rights of same-sex couples. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
" The landmark 1953 case that gave vitality to the "state secrets" privilege was United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 10:44 am
In its recent opinion in United States v.... [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm
Or would they have insisted that they all be moved to the United States? [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
If Salim v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:36 am
He said the United States did not use "brute force" and the memos prove detainees weren't tortured. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:54 am
" Medellin v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:10 pm
Luchenitser of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Prof. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 7:29 pm
Bush, Civ. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
United Airlines U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 9:14 pm
Guantanamo was chosen by the Bush administration in the belief that the writ of habeas corpus could not reach outside the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
Earlier yesterday the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion (5-4) in New Process Steel, LP v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Heller – Agreed 25-Mar United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:43 am
OSHA has instead pretextually redefined what is at this point a hazard of life in the United States and throughout the world—COVID-19—as a hazard of the workplace. [read post]
