Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2008, 4:33 am
Tripp v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:28 am
Galvan v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:30 pm
SEC v Panuwat : US Court for the Northern District of California case no. 21-cv-6322 [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:50 am
"See a list of ILB entries on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of Morrison v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
The UCLA School of Law Emmett Center on Climate Change and the Environment today released a report, Rules of the Game: Examining Market Manipulation, Gaming and Enforcement in California’s Cap and Trade Program, that considers whether California’s proposed cap and trade program would be vulnerable to such market manipulation. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
Buckley v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm
While a pro-employee trend may mean higher prices as companies try to pass on at least some of the new costs to customers, the public should benefit from more reliable and safer services. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm
While a pro-employee trend may mean higher prices as companies try to pass on at least some of the new costs to customers, the public should benefit from more reliable and safer services. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 5:48 am
Additional Resources: Calif. minimum wage law could trigger lawsuits, Sept. 27, 2013, By Dan Cook, Benefits Pro More Blog Entries: California Discrimination Lawsuits Impacted by Wal-Mart v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:48 am
In fact, this guidance may very well have been issued as a result of those actions, particularly SEC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:49 am
Will it be Chapter 7 v. 13? [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:35 pm
As mentioned by the court, not only did Paul’s company bring various spam lawsuits, but Paul’s brother Jim Wagner owns Hypertouch, Inc., an ISP based in California that is also a frequent spam plaintiff. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Bebe Au Lait, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court’s June 23, 2018 decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:35 pm
Jensen Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:24 pm
Given that the manufacturer's massive price hike on Norvir came about following the company's recognition that Kaletra would face new competition in the “boosted” PI market, and was not accompanied by a commensurate rise in its price for Kaletra, the increase could have been motivated by anticompetitive malice, the court determined. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:32 am
Per court documents, Lefkowitz and the California-based company’s CEO manipulated the company share price and volume so that insiders would reap the financial rewards while the shareholders suffered. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm
Churchill IV’s stock price continued to climb, closing on February 18, 2021, at an all-time high of over $58 per share. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
Chernuk Plaintiff Wins $7,000 Following Bench Trial on Claims Under California Anti-Spam Statute — Balsam v. [read post]
