Search for: "Com. v. Stores" Results 221 - 240 of 272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Why Vringo Has Sued ZTE Australia http://t.co/eNoQtDKQiZ -> What is a patent troll “This is not a licensing negotiation, this is extortion” http://t.co/eNoQtDKQiZ -> Pirates force costs reduction http://t.co/Xyp1Bbfmf4 -> Browsewrap not enforced by court Roller v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:45 am by Eric
Mike Masnick blew open the story on Dajaz1.com, which ICE seized on an ex parte basis, conducted secret proceedings for a year, and then gave back the domain name with no explanation. * Graduated Response. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 11:45 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The IRS will then send you a code that you can take to a participating 7-Eleven store (no, I’m not kidding). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
The agency also has raised questions about how its “.com Disclosures: How to Make Effective Disclosures in Digital Advertising” guidance document relates to advertising appearing in virtual reality and the metaverse. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]