Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 221 - 240 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2016, 4:42 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Exemption Rules Appeal Won’t Be Resolved Before Obama Leaves Office — via Wage & Hour Insights Ignoring the minimum wage is a big deal! [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
— from Michigan Employment Law Avis Loses De-Cert Motion In Shift Managers FLSA Collective Overtime Action — from Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights New bill in Congress will revamp FMLA to cover smaller employers — from Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Employment Law IQ: FMLA Interference – What Would You Do? [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:28 am by Eric Segall
By Eric SegallI wrote an essay for SLATE this week making a non-partisan case against the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
by Eric SegallI was recently asked to guest teach a class at Michigan State Law School on the topic of the appropriate judicial role and whether the Supreme Court is or is not a real court (I argue in my book the Court is not a real court). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:23 am by Sasha Volokh
Here is a (not necessarily complete) list, in no particular order: our own co-blogger David Bernstein of George Mason, our former co-blogger Jacob Levy of McGill, Jonathan Holloway, provost of Northwestern, Sigal Ben-Porath, professor of education, philosophy, and political science at Penn, Nancy Leong, law professor at Denver, Eric Segall, law professor at Georgia State, Alex Tsesis, law professor at Loyola University Chicago, Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for… [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:27 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Should You Fire Social Media Trolls? [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:00 pm
By Eric SegallI have been writing, reading, teaching and talking about originalism since 1995. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:25 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog A Puzder-Led Labor Department Would Make Life Much Harder for U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Hyman
— from Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Supreme Court Defines “Changing Clothes” under Section 203(o) of the FLSA — from Minnesota Employment Law Report What the Supreme Court’s Decision on Donning and Doffing DOES NOT MEAN! [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Eric Segall
By Eric Segall[Disclaimer: So far my family has not been hit with the Virus nor do my wife and I have jobs where we have been hurt economically. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
---------------------------------*Postscript by blog editor Michael Dorf: Prof Segall refers to 27 amendments. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
Eric Segall in describing a recent article by Prof. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:55 pm
Marine Corps Maj, Eric Montalvo, to fly to Afghanistan in case the Afghans didn't release Jawad. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
(Eric Segall will be making his second appearance this year.) [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:03 am
The group, led by partners Jonathan Segal, James Redeker and John Nixon, was one of WolfBlock's leading practices. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
Eric Segall argues that predictions of originalism’s demise are misplaced because originalism never had any significant influence in the first place. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:44 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Please see Eric Goldman’s blog for a more detailed discussion of Judge Segal’s ruling and SCA developments. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
” Exempting places of worship from quarantine orders is a “terrible mistake,” University of Texas Law School’s Sanford Levinson and Georgia State University College of Law’s Eric Segall write in the American Constitution Society Expert Forum. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am by Edith Roberts
Eric Segall contends in The Daily Beast that, contrary to much recent hand-wringing by “legal pundits and academic Court watchers” about the ills of an evenly divided eight-member Court, “there are many advantages to such a Court, and we might all be better off if both political parties in the Senate made a commitment to keep this balance permanent. [read post]