Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 221 - 240 of 13,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 10:11 am
An individual exercises his First Amendment right to criticize a public figure. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
I think that you can figure out how this case comes out based solely upon two facts:(1) the fact that it's in front of the California Supreme Court; and(2) the fact that the first sentence of the opinion begins: "Defendant Alphonso Howard was sentenced to death after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, rape, and a forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:06 pm
Here is the abstract.2012 marks the 80th anniversary of Donoghue v Stevenson, a case that is frequently cited as the starting-point for a genealogy of negligence. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:00 pm
Or even low-level "investments," like the ones here, where you're getting five figures from people in your church to market a dubious product on the basis of exceptionally dubious representations. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
******************************************Do you remember Cases T-604/11 and T-292/12 Mega Brands International v OHIM, Diset? [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
If you can figure out the syntax of this post's headline, you've just figured out the rationale of the Wisconsin Supreme Court in E-L Enterprises, Inc v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:48 pm by Simon Gibbs
To remind you of the figures, the Master initially assessed the costs, […] [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:51 pm
I have been sitting here for a while now trying to figure out exactly how to convey the depth and scope of the idiotic precedential decision issued by the Federal Circuit on Monday, September 9, 2008, in Medical Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
In addition, Kalman discusses the criticisms of Brown v. [read post]