Search for: "Grace v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2010, 3:23 am
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Supermac’s applied to cancel McDonald’s EUTM for BIG MAC which has long passed its initial five-year use grace period. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:01 pm
Williams v . [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am
Mary SchroederUnited States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:15 am
In that case, O'Handley v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
That all came crashing down when the Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
If Taylor v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:35 pm
Additionally, the court cited Ferguson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
* Time for a harmonised grace period, says FICPIThe debate over whether there should be a harmonised international grace period, allowing limited disclosure or commercialisation of an invention before filing a patent application, has rumbled along for many years. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 9:52 am
The December 9, 2016, decision in Silva v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 5:11 am
The 1980, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Life Insurance Company of the Southwest v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
For example, in the 1980, Texas Supreme Court case, Life Insurance Company of the Southwest v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:52 am
Grace did years ago in the situation that became the First Circuit case of Bunch v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:12 am
Or Morse v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:05 am
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
Grace & Co. 355 B.R. 462, 476 (Bankr. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 6:23 am
The CFPB further states that it plans to so advise, and to provide sufficient time to allow for orderly discontinuation of the December forms, when it issues a final rule to restate Regulation V in 2013. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 9:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
In this case, X v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2021] EWHC 355 (Fam)), the claimant demanded the recognition by the UK authorities of her child’s adoption in Nigeria. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:12 am
In other words the appellant stated “The trial court was wrong in that . . . [read post]
