Search for: "Green v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 2,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 11:20 pm by zshapiro
While the appeal was pending before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court the United States Supreme Court ruled in Gray v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:30 am by Isaul Verdin, Immigration Lawyer
  The MAVNI program allows participants to bypass the green card process and receive expedited United States citizenship. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:37 pm
But now an adult Green seeks compensation from her Illinois school district based on its liability in the abuse (Green v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:11 pm
CSR regularly advertised its asbestos in a trade magazine that was published and circulated in the United States.CSR also acted as the exclusive distributor of Australian sugar to customers in the United States and regularly used the Port of Baltimore to make such distributions. [read post]
10 May 2009, 2:00 pm
United States, No. 08-1270, and the pro se IFP cert petition in Brown v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 12:01 pm by Chris Cheatham
  With the launch of LEED v. 3.0, the United States Green Building Council (USGBC) announced it would revoke certification of projects that failed to meet minimum requirements. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Even though CBP may have taken your actual green card, you are still a lawful permanent resident until an Immigration Judge issues a final order of your removal from the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The recent rejection, by a panel of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights, of the British government’s attempt to overturn the ruling in Greens and MT v United Kingdom (prisoner voting) case, brings into focus the role of the Strasbourg Grand Chamber. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
THE UNITED KINGDOM - 65727/01 [2007] ECHR 468 (12 June 2007) DODDS v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
” China and the United States both understood well in 2009 what it meant for the two governments to commit to the development of green industries. [read post]