Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale (with whom Lord Hodge and Lord Kerr agreed). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
Supreme Court in Too Much Media LLC et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:30 am
The Supreme Court granted permission to appeal in Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2014] EWCA Civ 15 in order to re-examine the Hill immunity and liability for the police in negligence. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:42 pm
In a February 9, 2011 post I discussed the case of Too Much Media LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:14 am
Lady Hale therefore concluded that Westminster still owed the appellant a duty to secure suitable accommodation. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
One of the particular features of that case was the serious criticism which some of the members of the court directed at Baroness Hale (see for example “I totally disagree with, and deplore, Lady Hale’s suggestion . . . [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:21 pm
The petition of the day is: Darin v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
The post Case Preview: Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
The Supreme Court has granted the artist in the “banned memoir” case, OPO v MLA, permission to appeal and ordered an expedited hearing. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
Dumont, Partner, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr Eric L. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:10 am
"So begins a somewhat hysterical piece by Melanie Phillips in the Daily Mail today referring, of course, to Lady Hale's comments in the Scottish case of Gow v Grant.How could Lady Hale's very reasonable view that English and Welsh cohabitants and their children should have the benefit of the same protection that their Scottish counterparts have give rise to such a venomous response? [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:40 pm
Clark v Novacold mostly disapproved. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:44 pm
Framing the case USA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am
Lord Kerr and Baroness Hale gave dissenting judgments. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:50 am
The House of Lords has today given its judgment in the case of R (G) v Southwark [2009] UKHL 26. [read post]
26 May 2016, 2:40 am
This question was recently addressed by the Supreme Court in the case of Knauer v Minstry of Justice. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
With reference to Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 213, Lady Hale accepted that refusing for religious reasons to perform some aspects of a j [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:05 am
Kowaleski v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:11 am
Lady Hale considered it disturbing that the Convention excludes damages claims for breaches of individuals’ fundamental rights, and the parties to the Convention should address the grave injustice done to those in the appellant’s position. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:14 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
