Search for: "Hicks v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2013, 6:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Discharged for violating his employer’s conduct policy against the use of “abusive or threatening language,” a quality control inspector was unable to convince the New Hampshire Supreme Court that there was a jury issue as to whether state public policy supporting “self-defense” made his discharge wrongful (Leeds v BAE Systems, November 5, 2013, Hicks, G). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
  As the court notes in State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  The question presented in State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
On 19 December 2019, Warby J gave Judgment in the case of Triplark Limited v  Northwood Hall (Freehold) Limited (2) Philip Whale (3) David Wismayer [2019] EWHC 3494 (QB). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
  On the menu was "Obviousness over the common general knowledge", followed by mulled wine and mince pies, all served up by chair Michael Hicks, the man behind the successful obviousness over CGK challenge way back when in Pozzoli SpA v BDMO SA & Others [2006] EWHC 1398 (Pat) (first instance) and [2007] EWCA Civ 588 (Court of Appeal). [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 2:10 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Larry Ribstein
The Supreme Court, per Scalia, opined yesterday in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
This was stated in Best Buy v Worldwide Sales Corporation [2000]FSR 686, in which Floyd J expressed concern about “exporting” the threats provisions overseas. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 1:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm by Robert Tanha
Indeed, at the very minimum, he would be required, under the rule in Wilson v. [read post]