Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 221 - 240
of 596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2016, 7:10 am
Darren E. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:07 am
In a follow-up, Howard Wasserman raised questions about the reciprocity aspect, what professors called students. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 3:29 pm
Howard Wasserman has posted the details for the Ninth Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop, which will take place at Emory on March 31 - April 1, 2017. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:45 pm
Howard Wasserman of Prawf’s Law Blog discusses his thoughts on the response one unknown law professor wrote to students who took issue with the professor wearing a Black Lives Matter t-shirt to class. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
Commentary related to the decision comes from Howard Wasserman of PrawfsBlawg, Nancy LeTourneau at Washington Monthly, and Irene Scharf at the Human Rights at Home Blog. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
United States), and from Cassandra Robertson and Howard Wasserman in two posts at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:04 am
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, echoing Justice Ginsburg’s dissent, argues that “[i]t makes no sense for a statute's private right of action not to be coextensive with the substantive law being applied”: Ginsburg is correct that there should be a link, not separation, between prohibited activities and authorized remedies. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:15 pm
Three views from law professors: Jeannie Suk (from whom the above quote is taken), Howard Wasserman, Stephen Bainbridge. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 6:11 pm
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg describes a post by Mark Joseph Stern at Slate: He ties the recall petition to a host of issues in which progressive commitment to due process, basic defendant rights, and judicial independence have run aground in... [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 3:30 am
Howard M. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am
Commentary comes from Hera Arsen and Gustavo Suarez for the Ogletree Deakins blog, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg (who also discusses the decision in Merrill Lynch v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:30 am
Josh Blackman and Howard M. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:19 am
Commentary on the decision comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog and Justin Sadowsky at Dubitante; Howard Wasserman has more on the ruling at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
” And at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that today marks the seventieth anniversary of the death of Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, which left the Court with just seven members. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
” Commentary on the ruling comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Howard M. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Commentary on Garland’s nomination and the effect that Garland would have on the Court if he were confirmed comes from Howard Wasserman, who at PrawfsBlawg agrees with Geoffrey Stone that Garland would “move the Court left, but not back to the days of a bloc of six reliably liberal Justices”; Erwin Chemerinsky, who in The Atlantic imagines what it might “mean to have five justices on the Supreme Court who were appointed by Democratic… [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
The Penn Law Review recently published a new take on the academic discussion of baseball’s infield fly rule (h/t Howard Wasserman, at Prawfs). [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:07 am
Johnson (Johnson), Howard J. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who discusses the timing for a successor at PrawfsBlawg; from Kent Scheidegger, who criticizes the record of Judge Jane Kelly in capital cases at Crime and Consequences; and in an op-ed for USA Today, where Eric Wang argues that, although we “may not know for sure exactly what Scalia would have thought about the merits of the arguments now being made about who should appoint his successor,” “we do know what he would have… [read post]
