Search for: "IN RE FISCHER"
Results 221 - 240
of 484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Meg Kinnear, Geraldine Fischer, Jara Minguez Almeida, Luisa Fernanda Torres, & Mairée Uran Bidegain have published Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Wolters Kluwer 2016). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:47 pm
" It appears as part of Contested Collisions: Norm Fragmentation in World Society 198-225 (Kerstin Blome, Andreas Fischer-Lescano, Hannah Franzki, Nora Markard, and Stefen Oeter, editors; Cambridge University Press, 2016).The contribution considers the extent to which it is possible to order the many layers of governance (law, soft law, normative standards, individual practices, contractual arrangements, custom, etc.) [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:30 am
Fischer did not, and could not, accurately foretell the future. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:53 am
The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases are being jointly administered in lead case captioned In re Chaparral Energy, Inc., et al., Case No. 11144. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
"This camp is a dream come true for our riders and we're so thankful to our volunteers and sponsors who help make it happen each year," Fischer said. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:51 am
Sven Fischer suggests that applicants may suffer from both an optimism bias and an overconfidence bias. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:34 am
On February 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in In re Messer, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-510. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:35 am
Henein: “You’re watching him! [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 6:09 am
Lobbying Arizona: “Embattled Arizona Utility Regulator Decides to Quit” by Howard Fischer (Capitol Media Services) for Arizona Daily Star Missouri: “Andrew Blunt’s Lobbying Work Faces Scrutiny as He Manages Father’s Re-Election Bid” by Deirdre Shesgreen (USA Today) for Springfield News-Leader Pennsylvania: “Lobbyist Reform Bills in Pa. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
Fischer and Rick D. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:24 am
The result is that the dictum by Mrs Justice Proudman in Meltwater, ie that “the test of quality has been re-stated but … not significantly altered by Infopaq” (para 81), possibly (and regrettably) still remains the most explicit stance in this respect. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 6:02 am
For media information or a copy of the citation, contactElaine Fischer, L&I Public Affairs at 360-902-5413. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Richard Re covered the decision for this blog, with commentary from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:01 pm
“It means they make food outbreaks a priority and they’re investigating more of them. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:42 am
Eric Fischer, a transportation researcher and Oakland resident, was among the first to notice these changes: As Mr. [read post]
10 May 2015, 11:02 am
Based on a re-evaluation of the data, it concludes there are minimal differences in outcome for children raised by same-sex parents and married opposite-sex parents. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Jess Bravin covered that argument for The Wall Street Journal, with commentary coming from Richard Re and Carissa Hessick at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the prior… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the prior… [read post]
