Search for: "Jack Goldsmith" Results 221 - 240 of 764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 4:41 am
Jack Goldsmith could only tolerate 9 months in the Office of Legal Counsel during the Bush administration, documented in his book The Terror Presidency. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:48 pm by Orin Kerr
Here’s the intro to the blog from Ben’s first post on Wednesday: Welcome to Lawfare, a new blog by Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith, and myself. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:45 pm by Suzanne Ito
Earlier this month at Harvard Law School, ACLU Deputy Legal Director Jameel Jaffer and Harvard Law Professor Jack Goldsmith, who in 2003 and 2004 led the Bush administration's Office of Legal Counsel, debated the legitimacy of controversial national security policies relating to targeted killing, indefinite detention and military commissions. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 7:05 am by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller In the past few hours, both Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes have argued that the Obama administration has “reluctantly” claimed that the ACLU/CCR lawsuit must be dismissed because of the state-secrets privilege. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:43 am
  Here's some reading to enjoy on this last day of vacation: Randy Barnett's op-ed on Raich in The Wall Street JournalDahlia Lithwick and Jack Goldsmith's take on the US Att'y firings in Slate An obit of Bowie Kuhn, of the famous Flood v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 6:56 am
[On Point] Jack Goldsmith's four questions for AG nominee Mukasey. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:14 pm by Duncan Hollis
by Duncan Hollis Bobby Chesney, Jack Goldsmith, and Ben Wittes have started a new blog, Lawfare: Hard National Security Choices. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:45 am
A little behind the crowd (as usual), I finally got to Jack Goldsmith's new book, The Terror Presidency, this weekend. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 8:48 pm
Fascinating article in today’s New York Times concerning Jack L. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:36 pm by Howard Bashman
“Thoughts On Judge Ho’s Clerkship Boycott”: At “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Jack Goldsmith has a guest post that begins, “My friend Judge James Ho recently announced that he is boycotting the hiring of law clerks from my alma mater, Yale Law School, because it ‘tolerates the cancellation of views’ and ‘actively practices it. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 6:05 pm by Howard Bashman
And at their “Executive Functions” Substack site, Bob Bauer and Jack Goldsmith have a post titled “The Trump Executive Orders as ‘Radical Constitutionalism’; Much more than ‘test cases’ may be at stake in Trump’s aggressive claims of presidential authority. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:39 am by Kenneth Anderson
 (I also agree with Jack Goldsmith, btw, that the real issues are domestic law authorities; I don’t think there’s that much more to say about the international law behind this. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:24 am by Kenneth Anderson
The keynote speaker will be Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 12:51 am
In the Wall Street Journal, Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner ask, "Does Europe Believe in International Law? [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:39 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Harvard’s Jack Goldsmith and Lawrence Lessig have an interesting op-ed in today’s Washington Post arguing that it woudl be constitutionally dubious for President Obama to adopt the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) as an executive agreement. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 6:13 am
He confirms Jack Goldsmith's earlier testimony that the Deputy Attorneys General (Larry Thompson and then Jim Comey) were not permitted to be read into the program and, more astonishingly still, that the lawyers at the NSA itself were not permitted to see the John Yoo-penned legal opinions that provided the basis for the program the NSA was operating! [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 10:52 am by Tom Smith
Harvard law professor Jack Goldsmith and University of Arizona law professor Andrew Keane Woods have called for Chinese-style censorship of the internet, stating in The Atlantic that “in the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. [read post]