Search for: "Kelly v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 944
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Cox:As provided by Title 28, Section 508(B) of the United States Code and Title 28, Section 0.132(A) of the Code of Federal Regulations, I have today assumed the duties of Acting Attorney General.In that capacity I am, as instructed by the President, discharging you, effective a [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 9:53 am
" So, those waiting for the United States to clarify it accusation are likely to be left hungry. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 11:33 am
United States (Jan. 14) Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
United States, a fraud prosecution stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey, arguing that “[i]f the Court chooses to apply the logic of Department of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:20 am
United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 11:39 am
This edited volume is part of a collaboration among law professors and others to rewrite, from a feminist perspective, key judicial decisions in the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
Kelly Chambers, for the State. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
This two-decade trend started in 1999 with United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
United States, finding that licenses were not property; Skilling v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Unsatisfied by her response, Nadler concluded his questioning by rather bluntly stating that the Trump administration will need to offer a more compelling argument to reauthorize the “perhaps useless” CDR program than “maybe someday it’ll do some good. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
During its upcoming term, in Espinoza v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment finding that Congress properly delegated authority to the U.S. attorney general to apply the registration requirements of a sex-offender-registration law, “may presage a coming sea change in judicial review of agency rules implementing broad Congressional directives. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
