Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 221 - 240
of 7,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
In the ongoing struggle between Apple and Motorola over claims of patent infringement in just one of many battles that is taking place across the country over smart phones, both parties proposed claim constructions that were not particularly well-written for lay jurors. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:18 am
The recent ACCA decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 8:07 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
AC35436 - Di Teresi v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
Julce v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:16 pm
In today’s case (Gaebel v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:32 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:53 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:44 am
Canan Ruddick v Roese Pipeline Company, Inc., et al., St. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
Inline Connection Corporation v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 5:43 am
Quinn Heraty reports on the trademark battle to make us forget SPAM v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 10:38 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 6-2 in Michigan v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 1:37 pm
As usual, they have a very complete post laying out this issue, focused on the defense lawyers' perspective but much of it applies to plaintiffs' lawyers as well. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 12:48 pm
On February 13 the State & Local Legal Center will host a webinar on T-Moble v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 3:53 am
This is its reaction to the European Court of Justice's ruling in the Commission v Council case in 2005. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:34 am
Practice point: A motion for a preliminary injunction opens the record and gives the court authority to pass upon the sufficiency of the underlying pleading, but this power does not extend to an evaluation of conflicting evidence.Student note: The motion court may not, on its own initiative, convert a motion for a preliminary injunction into one for summary judgment without giving adequate notice to the parties and affording them an opportunity to lay bare their proof.Case: Alexandre… [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:23 pm
., L.P. v Cataldo, 2011 NY Slip Op 00678 (2d Dept. 2011): Affiant could work for successor entity and lay a proper business record foundation for the documents. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 5:56 am
Byrom v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:14 pm
Vajazzle \v? [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 4:05 am
In Tolle v. [read post]