Search for: "Lord v. Lord" Results 221 - 240 of 6,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 2:16 am
Regina v Islam House of Lords “It was consistent with both the language and spirit of the statutory scheme for making confiscation orders for the importation of prohibited drugs to take account of the black market value of such drugs when valuing the benefit obtained by the defendant at the time of their illegal importation. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:09 am
Child Support Agency v Truman; [2009] WLR (D) 40 “The test for the correct comparator in cases of disability-related discrimination in the employment field under s 3A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, was the same as that applied to the housing provisions of the Act by the House of Lords in Lewisham London Borough Council [...] [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:47 am
Fisher v Brooker and Others House of Lords “A delay of almost 40 years in claiming a share of the copyright in a musical work, could not be defeated by the equitable doctrines of estoppel or laches when the defendants had suffered no detriment from the claimant's delay and, on the contrary, had derived a financial benefit [...] [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:51 am
Regina v Chargot and Others House of Lords “In criminal proceedings against an employer after an accident ot work, it was sufficient for the prosecution to prove merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work, without identifying and proving specific breaches of duty by the employer. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:53 am
LB Croydon v Wright  [2008] EWCA Civ 607 (not on Bailii) was adjourned until the Lords have heard Malcolm despite Croydon wishing to press ahead. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am by DR PAUL DALY, QUEENS' COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE
In Dover District Council v CPRE Kent [2017] UKSC 79, Lord Carnwath offered some important observations on the duty to give reasons in administrative law. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 2:27 am
On Monday 18 and Tuesday 19 October R v Chaytor and others will be heard over two days by nine Justices: Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Collins, Kerr and Clarke. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:07 am
Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will consider whether the condition attached to claiming a state pension credit, of the right of [...] [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:18 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 to 18 January 2011 Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
It will be heard on Monday 7 and Tuesday 8 February 2011 by Lords Phillips, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 2:27 am
On Monday 18 and Tuesday 19 October R v Chaytor and others will be heard over two days by nine Justices: Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Collins, Kerr and Clarke. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:28 am
There's a technical one about European Arrest Warrants, Pilecki v Circuit Court of Legnica; technical consolidated criminal appeals about the need for an indictment, Clarke and McDaid; a Norther Irish case about proceeds of crime, In re Maye; and a landlord and tenant case, Majorstake [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:12 am
Most of the media attention, if the judgments get any attention on budget day, will be on Norris v United States, the extradition case in [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:47 am
Regina (Lee) v Same; Regina (Wells) v Same House of Lords “Although the Secretary of State for Justice had failed in his public duty to provide such treatment courses for prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection as would enable them to demonstrate to the Parole Board that it was safe to release them, their post-tariff detention [...] [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
 Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison and Arnold and Sir Nicholas Patten) Geofabrics Ltd v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Ltd (Rev 1) [2021] EWCA Civ 854 (11 June 2021)In Geofabrics Ltd v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Ltd [2020] EWHC 444 (Pat) (5 March 2020) which I discussed in Patents - Geofabrics Ltd v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Ltd. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
As predicted by various commentators  giving a preview of the case (including in my previous post), the five Supreme Court judges (Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs) clarified the applicable law, but unanimously dismissed the appeals against the Court of Appeal decision ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334) on the facts. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:22 am
Pleural plaques provide no cause of action Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd and Another; Topping v Benchtown Ltd (formerly Jones Bros Preston Ltd); Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd; Grieves v F. [read post]