Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 221 - 240
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2009, 6:16 am
I've been following developments in Guantanamo and related counterterrorism detention and trial issues for a while (e.g. here and there), and am from that part of the academic universe still mourning Marty Lederman's departure from the blogosphere.With rumors now flying fast and furious that the erstwhile senatorial trio of Graham, Levin, and McCain are hoping (against hope) that the third time will be the charm on legislative efforts to resolve the mess at Guantanamo, it… [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
One of the things that both Marty Lederman and Doug Kmiec agree on is that the President is authorized to disagree with--and thus, presumably, to "override"--OLC opinons that he/she objects to. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Marty Lederman has extensive analysis of this motion as well.Mic reports that conservative politicians are drawing analogies to the civil rights movement. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
... [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 12:30 am
Magliocca and my Georgetown Law colleague Marty Lederman, who provided me with this link to Felix Frankfurter and Thomas Corcoran's draft and this link to the final text, were struck by what Marty calls FDR's "swagger, disdain and passion," in what is, in effect, "a victory lap," notwithstanding the defeat of the Court-packing plan. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 4:15 pm
As a practical matter, as Marty Lederman has suggested elsewhere, it is quite unlikely that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is unaware that he has a right to remain silent, either because of his knowledge of American culture or because his alleged terrorism-masters in Chechnya would surely have had the wit to say (something like) "if you're captured, remember that those wimp Americans will accord you a right to remain silent." [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:32 pm
A discussant of Marty Lederman's most recent post, on McNulty's testimony, asks, I assume rhetorically, "Can anyone identify the crime that was committed in the firings of the attorneys? [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:37 pm
Marty Lederman has a very interesting post at Balkinization on national injunctions. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 9:11 pm
Marty Lederman finds this "absurd," and I am inclined to agree. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:53 am
It is authored by Marty Lederman, who will be familiar to readers of this blog. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 4:21 am
See Eric Posner ("I suspect the deal is a loan in form but a purchase in substance") at The Volkoh Conspiracy, Carolyn Elefant at Legal Blog Watch, David Zaring at The Conglomerate and Marty Lederman at Balkanization. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:20 pm
And earlier, Marty Lederman posted these thoughts on both Hein and Morse here. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 6:40 pm
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:15 am
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Rellgionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
The Lawfare blog is a useful source for a moderately conservative spin (Steve Vladeck's posts are an exception to the spin) on developments in the law of counterterrorism -- not as useful as Marty Lederman's less frequent posts here, of course. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 4:05 am
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:46 pm
’”[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:50 am
Even if there is standing, Congress does not require an enumerated power to force no one to do anything, as Marty Lederman and I have separately explained.3. [read post]
