Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado" Results 221 - 240 of 1,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In June, the Supreme Court agreed to review this question: Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Because the prosecutors never put on a case against him, the state supreme court found, Martinez was never “at risk. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:08 am by David McLain
The Colorado Supreme Court has indicated that a CCPA violation requires proof that the defendant knowingly engaged in a deceptive trade practice.[1] Colorado Court of Appeals panels have subsequently interpreted “bad faith” conduct to require an intent to deceive, or a finding that defendant knew or should have known its actions were deceiving. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Ct. 662 (2024), the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Colorado Supreme Court erred in excluding President Donald J. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:26 pm by Patrick J. McMahon
The Colorado Supreme Court, however, held that the employer was within its rights to terminate the employee. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:56 pm by Unknown
HB 20-1348 – Additional Liability Under Respondeat SuperiorOn March 17, 2017, the Colorado Supreme Court issued its decision in a case entitled Ferrer v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:30 am by David McLain
[1] This is a codification of the Colorado Supreme Court decision in Vallagio at Inverness Residential Condo. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:21 am by David M. McLain
 The Colorado Supreme Court has indicated that a CCPA violation requires proof that the defendant knowinglyengaged in a deceptive trade practice.[1]  Colorado Court of Appeals panels have subsequently interpreted “bad faith” conduct to require an intent to deceive, or a finding that defendant knew or should have knownits actions were deceiving. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
I’ve taken a day to chew over the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
In Barger, the defendant chose to carry a gun into a bar, but there was no evidence in the record that he reasonably feared for his safety on his way to the bar or in the bar itself....As the citation to the 1977 Colorado Supreme Court case People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am by MBettman
On January 23, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 9:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As a result, beginning in 1963, the Supreme Court has issued orders in the Arizona v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court gave the green light for broader remote sales tax collections by overturning the physical presence requirement, tax observers have wondered which state’s remote sales tax regime will be the next to show up in court. [read post]