Search for: "Owings v. Speed" Results 221 - 240 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2016, 9:52 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The plaintiff was warned verbally by security to get out of the way, but he was unable to avoid being hit by the speeding car. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” The Dutch government cut speed limits in the country to 62 miles per hour in an attempt to reduce nitrogen emissions. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm by Nate Russell
Last week, the BC Court of Appeal reversed the decision and released Ormiston v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by David Hart QC
 The duty owed by an expert witness in planning cases, on the contrary, is solely to his client. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon)   Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango)   Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46)   Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations:… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Matthew Finkin
The CaseCalifornia’s Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) allows an employee “aggrieved” by a violation of state’s wage, hour, and wage payment law to obtain civil penalties “on behalf of himself and other current or former employees. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
The court concluded that the veteran border patrol agent “reasonably suspected that a sport-utility-vehicle with California license plates containing six adult males of apparently Hispanic descent was transporting illegal aliens when the driver changed speeds erratically on a slippery road and the passengers appeared nervous and refused to acknowledge the agent’s attempts to gain their attention. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:55 am by Lyle Denniston
Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
If you owe a creditor $10, he or she must accept legal tender to satisfy the debt. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:00 pm
If you owe a creditor $10, he or she must accept legal tender to satisfy the debt. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Spencer, No. 07-40593 "A decision amending a 1995 judgment sentencing defendant for carjacking, resulting in an increase to the amount of restitution owed, is affirmed where: 1) under a reasonable reading of the relevant rules and case law, the district court's amendment amounted to a clerical revision that did not substantively alter defendant's sentence; and 2) thus, the time limitation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 was inapplicable. [read post]