Search for: "Penn Program on Regulation"
Results 221 - 240
of 608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 5:53 pm
Thanks to my colleague, Lisa Fairfax, GW has finalized the program for this year’s Junior Faculty Business and Financial Law Workshop and Prize (detailed here). [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
The program follows below. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
Regulations contain reporting obligations- Many environmental regulations, including hazardous waste regulations, contain mandatory reporting requirements. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In a recent article in the Penn State Law Review, practitioner Clay Sapp argues that food labels serve as marketing tools for manufacturers to highlight positive attributes and boost sales. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
I am honored to be with you here at Penn for the 2024 Distinguished Lecture on Regulation. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
The panel discussion was co-sponsored by the Penn Program on Regulation and the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 9:45 pm
Some of her regulatory interests include environmental regulation, international regulation, and financial regulation. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:21 am
Shils professor of law and political science and director of the Penn Program on Regulation (PPR). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:01 pm
On Tuesday, March 23, the Penn Program on Regulation hosted Professor Gary Yohe of Wesleyan University and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, to discuss quality control in the IPCC process in the wake of the “climate-gate” story that reverberated through the media late last year.Professor Yohe argued that, despite emails from scientists that have come to light and revelations of some errors in the IPCC’s AR4 report, scientists still understand… [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:08 pm
Toward that end, as part of the Penn Program on Regulation’s project on voluntary codes and standards, we have developed a suite of curricular materials—including a teaching guide, PowerPoint slides, discussion questions, and videos—that law faculty can use to introduce their students to the world of private standards in their existing courses, one set of which uses the Benzene Case as a pedagogical hook. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 9:30 pm
To provoke critical commentary on this widely accepted assumption, the Penn Program on Regulation (PPR) recently convened a conference to examine two simple questions: “Do regulations kill jobs? [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:49 pm
(See, Cuba Issues New Cooperatives Regulations: Tentative Experiment in Socialist Market Enterprise or a Privatization of State Management?) [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 7:22 pm
The PROGRAM follows. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
Cary Coglianese, Director of the Penn Program on Regulation, welcomes guests to Penn Law’s annual regulation dinner. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Cary Coglianese, a professor at Penn Law and the Director of the Penn Program on Regulation, moderated the discussion. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm
Filburn) would be a use restriction analyzed under Penn Central, but argued that this case was a permanent dispossession, and thus a per se taking. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 9:02 pm
The Supreme Court in 14 Penn Plaza v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Adam Finkel, Executive Director of the Penn Program on Regulation, testified before the House Small Business Committee's hearing, "Lifting the Weight of Regulations: Growing Jobs by Reducing Regulatory Burdens. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:00 pm
The Court then discussed the Penn Central standard, which requires an examination of three factors to determine whether a regulatory taking has occurred: (1) the economic impact of the regulation on the claimant; (2) the extent to which the regulation has interfered with the claimant’s reasonable, distinct investment-backed expectations; and (3) the character of the government action. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:00 pm
The Court then discussed the Penn Central standard, which requires an examination of three factors to determine whether a regulatory taking has occurred: (1) the economic impact of the regulation on the claimant; (2) the extent to which the regulation has interfered with the claimant’s reasonable, distinct investment-backed expectations; and (3) the character of the government action. [read post]
