Search for: "People v. Branch" Results 221 - 240 of 2,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
It stands to reason that people will do so as well. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:57 am by Daniel Suhr
There is no fourth branch called “independent agencies. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am by Elie Mystal
Judicial conservatism was once principally defined as a philosophy of deference to the democratically elected branches of government. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 10:00 am
In 2000, he wrote the opinion in People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 2:24 pm by Richard Primus
  A dozen years before Congress proposed the Twenty-Second Amendment, the Supreme Court decided Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This principle, "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government, requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
The individual claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status has the burden of demonstrating that he or she enjoys such status [see People v Hayes, 135 AD 19]; and2. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]