Search for: "People v. Deems"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:30 pm
The material witness statute represents a dramatic departure to the rule, allowing the arrest of uncharged, innocent, even cooperative people. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm
The changes are a response to Doe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm
The changes are a response to Doe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 5:06 am
In Banton v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:52 am
In Auster v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 9:11 am
Yesterday in People v Figueroa, 2008 NY Slip Op 01604, the First Department was confronted with whether the trial court violated the procedure in CPL § 310.30 after receiving a somewhat unusual note from the jury foreperson. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:39 am
" These claims are hard to win, but they are winnable.The case is Stephenson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm
But if your group incorporates, suddenly, the same activities by the same people were deemed under the campaign law outside the protections of the constitution. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:09 pm
Be it therefore resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the State of Georgia, in General Assembly met, and acting for the people thereof, that the State of Georgia, in conformity with the fifth article of the federal constitution, hereby makes application to the Congress of the United States for the call of a Convention of the people to amend the constitution aforesaid in the particulars herein enumerated, and in such others as the… [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
In NC Leasing LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
ObamaJewel v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
People v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:14 am
Today the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm
The court held that a person who could not live without assistance but whose income was too high for him to be deemed “categorically needy,” could not be offered services only in a nursing home, which was all that the state allowed for individuals deemed “medically needy. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
In People v Smith(2/16/12]) the Court of Appeals reversed a conviction for driving while impaired upon a holding that the trial court erred in permitting the People to introduce evidence that Mr. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 3:44 am
Judge Sean Cox’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:06 am
" Given this predicate, to whom do you think the opinion was referring in footnote eleven, which reads: "Each of Association and Appellees argues that the other's appeal as to the award of costs should be deemed frivolous. [read post]
