Search for: "People v. House" Results 221 - 240 of 12,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 5:09 pm by Jon
Journal of the House of Representatives(December, 1832)     Mr. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:38 am by Manar Waheed
 The court case on which the fate of these thousands of people rests is Ramos v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
That leaves the only other male in the house, defendant. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
Swindon BC v Redpath [2009] EWCA Civ 943 By s.153A(1) Housing Act 1996, a variety of social landlords, including local housing authorities, may apply for an injunction to restrain a person from engaging in “housing-related” anti-social behaviour. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by Kashmir Hill
People with 20 years of experience are applying for the lowest-level in-house jobs, said one in-houser. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Manual of Housing Law v Housing Law Handbook The latest version of the ‘Manual of Housing Law’ by Andrew Arden and Andrew Dymond is not a specialist tome like Defending possession Proceedings or Quiet Enjoyment, which I also reviewed recently, but is a compendium style book, covering a wide range of housing law matters, from security of tenure issues, through contractual problems, disrepair, rules for social landlords and on to environmental… [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 7:53 pm
In Inform Design and Construction Pty Ltd v Boutique Homes Melbourne Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 912  the Federal Court rejected a copyright claim in house plans (see previous note on Barrett v Metricon). [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
Marco said he did want another beer, and Lujano told him to come get it from his house. [read post]
15 May 2007, 5:03 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion today in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:15 am by SHG
Except the Third Circuit held this mortification to state a sufficient claim to go to trial in Revock v. [read post]