Search for: "People v. Stevens" Results 221 - 240 of 2,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2009, 11:39 am
 In any event, as Steven Pinker notes in a recent piece in the Atlantic "in a free society, these annoyances are naturally regulated in the marketplace of people's reactionsâ€â [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm by Brian Shiffrin
This, of course, is a very different holding and standard than the New York Court of Appeals had set forth in People v Ford (86 NY2d 397) in which the Court held that while it is ineffective assistance to affirmatively give bad advice on the immigration consequences, attorneys need not say anything. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law360 (subscription required), Tyler Maulsby argues that Flowers v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
”  And in The Economist, Steven Mazie concludes that the Justices “seemed divided about how to resolve” the case. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:06 pm
” Whatever you want to call it, Scalia talks about the right of individual people first. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
In the recent case of London Borough of Hillingdon v Neary [2011] EWHC 413 (COP) the issue of media access to Court of Protection proceedings arose for determination. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:55 pm by Steve
I know that many people have already seen this (it's a bit old), but I thought I'd comment on this op-ed by Professor Steven Calabresi. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am by Stephen Wermiel
Among targets of comments by Stevens are: — McCutcheon v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:02 am
Superior Court (1939) 33 Cal.App.2d 48, 52-53; see also Stevens v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:16 am
  But even I have to take pause when seeing a comparison of Kimbough to Brown v. [read post]