Search for: "People v. White (1980)" Results 221 - 240 of 348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2021, 11:29 am by Scott Bomboy
Scabby the Rat was created in Chicago in the late 1980s and named for a term used for nonunion people who replaced workers during a labor dispute. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Christopher Walker
Supreme Court recognized in Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:03 am by David Bernstein
In fact, while this is far from clear from the Common App, the underlying classification scheme considers people from Afghanistan to be white. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Frankfurter received letters from a number of people a number of people praising the appointment and its breaking of the racial barrier. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
This article will also review the surprising shift in the necessity challenge standard recently applied by the Michigan courts in the decisions of Village of Oxford v Nathan 1 Act 87 of 1980, MCL 213.51 et seq. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm by John F. Cooney
 OMB sent Jim Miller and Jim Tozzi; Agriculture sent its general counsel and his deputy, both named Jim; and the White House sent two Jims. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am by Ronald Collins
  On the one hand, TLDB was “first and foremost a defense of Brown v Board of Education,” as Adam White has correctly observed. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am by Ronald Collins
  On the one hand, TLDB was “first and foremost a defense of Brown v Board of Education,” as Adam White has correctly observed. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
The second most important protection for a grand jury witness is the Fifth Amendment.[6]  Unfortunately, business people, public officials, professionals and other white-collar types are loath to rely on the Fifth Amendment, concluding – with justification – that most people believe that one who invokes his or her Fifth Amendment rights is guilty of something. [read post]